Let’s set this up. Martin Bashir made an absolutely vile and shocking comment (even by MSLSD’s standards) prior to Levin’s destroying him. I’ll let you see it here:
[H/T Breitbart]: Conservative talk radio host Mark Levin condemned left-wing women’s groups Friday for ignoring MSNBC host Martin Bashir suggestion that former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin deserved an inhuman punishment once used against slaves which includes defecation in one’s mouth and urination in victims’ eyes and mouth.
After letting his listeners know that Bashir said on his MSNBC show that Palin deserved this “dose of discipline” a Jamaican slave master leveled on his slaves, Levin said Bashir likely had delivered the “most disgraceful rant” yet against Palin.
“Hey tough guy. You like picking on women? You like picking on a mother and a grandmother?” Levin said to Bashir. “You strike me as not tough at all, if you get my drift.”
Levin then blasted the “pathetic little carbon footprint called MSNBC” for being so “offended with Palin” comparing the federal debt to slavery that they would allow such rants. He said the network should be called the “animal channel” or the “comedy channel.”
Levin said Palin was exactly right to compare the federal debt to slavery and nothing was offensive about it, since she was not making a comparison to chattel slavery.
Levin then said “his people,” the “Jewish people,” were slaves, and he did not for one minute think Palin’s comparison was made to “diminish Jewish people or the early days of the nation.”
Levin then called out women’s group like the National Organization for Women (NOW) for “never” coming to the defense of conservative women like Palin.
Levin said these groups never defend conservative women from misogyny, even when it takes a turn towards the vile and filthy, because “they are not feminist groups. They are left-wing groups. They don’t care about women. They care about left-wing women.”
He said groups like NOW would “worship” Palin if she were a left-wing politician.
Listen to Mark destroy Bashir starting at 4:10 mark:
[H/T Walid Shoebat]: CIA personnel who witnessed the Benghazi attacks on 9/11/12 testified in front of the House Intelligence Committee behind closed doors this week. Rep. Mike Rogers (R-MI), chairman of the committee and Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA), who sits on the committee, appear to be at complete variance on one key issue. That issue?
Was there a lull in the fighting from approximately 0100 – 0500? Rogers says yes; Nunes says no.
The “Independent” Accountability Review Board (ARB) clearly implies that there was a four-hour lull, in its Unclassified Report. After closed-door testimony this week, Rogers indicates the lull was approximately three hours. Nunes indicated that there was none at all.
So, after talking to witnesses and getting more details, how come there are even more discrepancies?
This detail is important because Obama administration officials have attempted to assert that the reason help never came for the first attack is that there wasn’t sufficient time to respond. The reason given for why no help came for the second attack, which took place more than seven hours later, was because they thought everything was over. If there weren’t two separate attacks but one protracted fight that took place on two proximate fields of battle, the administration has a major problem on its hands.
That leads to an interview between Fox News Channel’s Megyn Kelly and Rep. Rogers, in which the closed door testimony is discussed. During this exchange, Rogers essentially echoes the findings of the ARB, saying that there was a lull in the fighting before the deaths of Navy SEALs Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty, that lasted about three hours (ARB implies it was four). He is then caught flat-footed when Kelly plays a short excerpt of an exchange between Nunes and Chris Wallace from one day earlier:
Watch the latest video at video.foxnews.comThis was an excellent accountability moment for Kelly and a weak response from Rogers, who seems to be saying that a key fact can be disagreed on by him and a fellow committee member from the same party after hearing witnesses give firsthand accounts. This is simply not acceptable or believable. As a key point, it should have been made clear during the session so there wouldn’tbe any inconsistencies. In testimony before the House Armed Services Committee earlier this year, former Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta said the following:
“The bottom line is this: that we were not dealing with a prolonged or continuous assault which could have been brought to an end by a U.S. military response… Very simply, although we had forces deployed to the region, time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning, [and] events that moved very quickly on the ground prevented a more immediate response.” {emphasis ours}
If this obvious contradiction continues to play in the media, look for Nunes to fall in line behind Rogers, the chairman. Should that happen, it should raise more questions, not fewer ones. If, as Rogers said, both he and Nunes heard things differently, we deserve to know why. The conflicting accounts from Rogers and Nunes should be explained, not dismissed. Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-MN) also sits on the Committee. Perhaps she can help clear some of this up. Here is the full interview between Nunes and Wallace:
Finally someone is talking about the secret security force that is mandated by Obamacare. And one of the good guys is exposing the evil, representative Louie Gohmert (Republican – Texas – 1st District) dropped a bombshell last week on The Janet Mefferd Show.
[H/T Infowars]: Referring to a section of the gargantuan Obamacare law which discusses “the president’s own commissioned and non-commissioned officer corps,” Gohmert drew attention to the notion that under the pretext of a “national emergency,” such individuals could be used to impose some form of medical martial law.
Under the Affordable Care Act, the Ready Reserve Corps is directed to “assist full-time Commissioned Corps personnel to meet both routine public health and emergency response missions.”
“It says it is for international health crises, but then it doesn’t include the word ‘health’ when it talks about national emergencies,” said Gohmert.
“I’ve asked, what kind of training are they getting….I want to know are they using weapons to train, or are they being taught to use syringes and health care items?” asked the Congressman, adding that “no clear answers” had been forthcoming on the issue.”
I first reported on this in August after reading a sobering article in The Daily Mail. Why does Obamacare need its own police force? The IRS already has agents trained with a multitude of weapons including AR-15s.
In the wake of Jeff Duncan’s reporting of IRS agents being trained with AR-15s I think we should be at least somewhat concerned with a breaking news story about the new “ObamaCare” Police. It would seem that the IRS implementation will not be the only strong arm of ObamaCare but that Health and Human Services will have a substantial number of investigative storm troopers as well.
More than 1,600 new employees hired by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Resources in the aftermath of Obamacare’s passage include just two described as ‘consumer safety’ officers, but 86 tasked with ‘criminal investigating’ – indicating that the agency is building an army of detectives to sleuth out violations of a law that many in Congress who supported it still find confusing.
On the day President Obama signed the Affordable Care Act into law in 2010, HHS received authority from the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) to make as many as 1,814 new hires under an emergency ‘Direct Hiring Authority’ order.
We are going to need more hollow point bullets it would seem. Is anyone really shocked by the fact that we have a brand new enforcement branch of HHS? I doubt it. This seems to be the norm in Washington these days. Last week we featured the story of a retired Marine Colonel who claims that a domestic army is being built. And who could blame anyone for thinking that? It is happening right in front of us.
Folks I made the comment at the beginning of this article about being validated because sometimes I feel really beat up by the “tin foil hat haters.”
Do you think I wake up each day and want to write about things that will leave me labeled as a lunatic? No I do not. I really don’t like people calling me crazy. That’s not my goal in life. I try to report these things to you because they are the truth and very few others seem to want to report such stories.
FactCheck.org states that Obamacare, “creates the ready reserve of individuals who can be called up for service by the U.S. surgeon general in times of need.” These are not things that I pull from thin air.
I have been screaming at the top of my lungs for almost a year that this stuff was happening and reaching dangerous levels. There is a police state being formed and your rights as an American citizen may soon be in dire jeopardy. I don’t know the time frame, but I do know it’s coming.
You can keep laughing at me if you want. That is your prerogative. This stuff is in black and white for everyone to see yet some just don’t want to take it seriously.
What I would kindly suggest is that you take a serious look at your self-defense capabilities. I am not really a prepper. My family is really in no financial position to stockpile anything. I would think that I am not the only one. The economy is horrible.
So here is my take. Guns and ammo are the most important thing by far. If you have firepower then you can hunt for food.
But good luck fighting off the bad guys with that freeze dried lasagna.
Many of you have never seen this video before. And for those that have, must be amazed at what Robert Welch was able to recognize what was happening in its very early stages
The list of ten is chilling in its pinpoint accuracy in the deliberate attacks against American sovereignty by subversive forces, both from within and without.
[H/T Reuters] – UnitedHealth Group dropped thousands of doctors from its networks in recent weeks, leaving many elderly patients unsure whether they need to switch plans to continue seeing their doctors, the Wall Street Journal reported on Friday.
The insurer said in October that underfunding of Medicare Advantage plans for the elderly could not be fully offset by the company’s other healthcare business. The company also reported spending more healthcare premiums on medical claims in the third quarter, due mainly to government cuts to payments for Medicare Advantage services.
The Journal report said that doctors in at least 10 states were notified of being laid off the plans, some citing “significant changes and pressures in the healthcare environment.” According to the notices, the terminations can be appealed within 30 days.
Tyler Mason, a UnitedHealth spokesperson, was not immediately available for comment when reached by Reuters.
The insurer told the WSJ that its provider networks were always changing and that it expected its Medicare Advantage network to be 85 percent to 90 percent of its current size by the end of 2014.
UnitedHealth is participating in about a dozen new state insurance markets that launched on October 1 to offer subsidized health coverage under President Barack Obama’s healthcare overhaul.
The insurer said previously it planned to withdraw from some markets in 2014 because of the government funding cuts.
Another top health insurer, Aetna Inc (AET.N), also warned in October that it expected slowing growth in 2014 in its Medicare Advantage plans.
[H/T Allen West]: Last week some fifteen Senate Democrats marched to the White House for an impromptu two-hour meeting with President Obama. They were not there to chat about BCS football standings. These Senators are up for reelection in the 2014 election cycle and came to voice their concerns about the unveiling of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), “Obamacare.”
Several of these Senators reside in Red states and are concerned about their political careers. The sad thing is, the impetus for their trek to the White House was concern about their election, not the people they are supposed to serve.
One of the Democrat Senators, Alaska’s Mark Begich, released a statement after the visit and referred to a “crisis in competence.”
I believe there is something far deeper occurring in our nation’s capital, a crisis in governance. Furthermore, I propose this crisis is rooted in a severe degradation of moral courage in American elected officials — I just cannot force myself to refer to most of them as “leaders.” Roman statesman and philosopher Marcus Tulius Cicero, who warned of the arrogance of officialdom, stated, “The enemy is within the gates; it is with our own luxury, our own folly, our own criminality that we have to contend.” One can make the case that this is exactly where we are when gazing upon the actions and lack of character emanating from Washington.
For me, there are two points of most grave concern with the rollout of the ACA: the lies spoken and the attempt to wish away the lies spoken.
We have arrived to a point where the person holding the highest office in the land can purposefully lie to the American people over a three year period. For the President of the United States to receive a four Pinocchio rating from a major newspaper, the Washington Post, reveals a disturbing phenomenon. Now of course detractors will say that “Bush lied” in relation to Iraq and weapons of mass destruction, except there were a whole bunch of Democrats and international leaders who believed and said the same.
This is a unique situation, a President deceiving the electorate in order to advance a policy agenda. President Nixon’s case revolved around a simple matter of “breaking and entering.” President Clinton’s lascivious indiscretion in the oval office was the nexus of his untruths. However, to have the Chief Executive of America lie not just once, but at least 24 times regarding Americans maintaining their most personal decision, their healthcare plans, is unconscionable.
What is more perplexing is President Obama’s explanation of what he “meant” to say but we were too incompetent to hear, by using the “if” word. With today’s modern media, all Americans know exactly what Mr. Obama stated. Mr. Obama’s first violation of moral courage is the lie, the second is the lie for the lie, and the last is that he fails to take responsibility, or accountability, to fervently admit he was wrong.
[H/T Walid Shoebat]: While alarm bells have been ringing over an unprecedented number of military commanders being relieved / purged under the Obama administration, the crusader ranks in the military might just be growing. Could an infidel movement be to the U.S. Military what the Tea Party was to the U.S. Government?
…Since 2007 the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) and its founder Mikey Weinstein have diligently documented violations of religious freedom within the military. During that time many of MRFF’s documentation of violations have included cases of anti-Islam/Muslim propaganda and activities.
In addition to these very troubling stories reported in the mainstream press and by rights organizations, Islamophobia Today has uncovered facts indicating that the pervasive “Crusader” sub-culture within the ranks of Islamophobes isn’t limited to internet forums and blogs but also exists within the US Military.
Anti-Muslim/Islam and pro-Crusader themes tied to military-use paraphernalia, including: T-Shirts, insignias, bullet coating, rifle scope cases as well as tattoos inscribed “Kafir,” and “Infidel” have become common within a sub-set of the US military. {emphasis ours}
Does this not make Weinstein an inconsistent atheist? Aren’t U.S. troops who adorn themselves with “Kafir” and “Infidel” apparel and tattoos mocking religious labels for them? As an atheist, shouldn’t Weinstein be defending soldiers who engage in such behavior?
Countless armed forces members have reached out to the Military Religious Freedom Foundation (MRFF) over the last nearly seven years to express their dire concern regarding the proliferation of literature, imagery, insignia, and much more which indicates that, indeed, some do see themselves as the Christian extremist counterparts of their Islamic fundamentalist, Salafi-Jihadist foes. This extremely dangerous Islamophobia, inextricably intertwined into the very fabric of the US armed forces, has reached such a dire level of toxicity…
…threatens to reignite the explosive tension and anti-American rage that exists across the Muslim world. “Crusader” is an epithet that is routinely used to describe US military personnel throughout the Arab and Islamic world. A phrase which literally means “taking up the cross,” Crusader recalls a history of colonization and campaigns of conquest and plunder spearheaded by European Christian military orders. Spanning three centuries and starting in the year 1096, the crusades viciously claimed the lives of millions of inhabitants of the Middle East… {emphasis ours}
Remember, that a pro-Muslim website named “Islamophobia Today” is making the case that when U.S. troops identify themselves outwardly in a way that Muslims they are fighting also identify them – as pork-eating apes, pigs, monkeys, infidels and kafirs – it is offensive to Muslims.
Conservative Angle Archives 
You must be logged in to post a comment.