TheBlaze reported: This one comes directly from the Obama White House:
Daily Archives: September 27, 2013
Bin Laden: Seymour Hersh Says Bin Laden Raid Is ‘One Big Lie,’ Obama Administration Lies Systematically
The Guardian reported: Seymour Hersh has got some extreme ideas on how to fix journalism – close down the news bureaus of NBC and ABC, sack 90% of editors in publishing and get back to the fundamental job of journalists which, he says, is to be an outsider.
It doesn’t take much to fire up Hersh, the investigative journalist who has been the nemesis of US presidents since the 1960s and who was once described by the Republican party as “the closest thing American journalism has to a terrorist”.
He is angry about the timidity of journalists in America, their failure to challenge the White House and be an unpopular messenger of truth.
Don’t even get him started on the New York Times which, he says, spends “so much more time carrying water for Obama than I ever thought they would” – or the death of Osama bin Laden. “Nothing’s been done about that story, it’s one big lie, not one word of it is true,” he says of the dramatic US Navy Seals raid in 2011.
Hersh is writing a book about national security and has devoted a chapter to the bin Laden killing. He says a recent report put out by an “independent” Pakistani commission about life in the Abottabad compound in which Bin Laden was holed up would not stand up to scrutiny. “The Pakistanis put out a report, don’t get me going on it. Let’s put it this way, it was done with considerable American input. It’s a bullshit report,” he says hinting of revelations to come in his book.
The Obama administration lies systematically, he claims, yet none of the leviathans of American media, the TV networks or big print titles, challenge him.
“It’s pathetic, they are more than obsequious, they are afraid to pick on this guy [Obama],” he declares in an interview with the Guardian.
“It used to be when you were in a situation when something very dramatic happened, the president and the minions around the president had control of the narrative, you would pretty much know they would do the best they could to tell the story straight. Now that doesn’t happen any more. Now they take advantage of something like that and they work out how to re-elect the president.
He isn’t even sure if the recent revelations about the depth and breadth of surveillance by the National Security Agency will have a lasting effect.
———————————
InfoWars reported: In a wide-ranging interview published today by the Guardian, Hersh savages the US media for failing to challenge the White House on a whole host of issues, from NSA spying, to drone attacks, to aggression against Syria.
On the subject of the Navy Seal raid that supposedly resulted in the death of the Al-Qaeda terror leader, Hersh remarked, “Nothing’s been done about that story, it’s one big lie, not one word of it is true.”
Hersh added that the Obama administration habitually lies but they continue to do so because the press allows them to get away with it.
“It’s pathetic, they are more than obsequious, they are afraid to pick on this guy [Obama],” Hersh told the Guardian.
The raid that supposedly led to Bin Laden’s death has been shrouded in mystery for over two years. Speculation that the Obama administration may have embellished or outright lied about the true account of what happened has persisted, mainly because the White House has refused to publicly release images of Bin Laden’s body.
Although the White House said the corpse was immediately “buried at sea” in line with Islamic tradition, it quickly emerged that this was not standard practice.
Numerous analysts have claimed that Bin Laden had in fact been dead for years and that the raid on his alleged compound in Pakistan was little more than a stunt.
Other questions also persist, such as why the narrative and timeline of the raid has changed multiple times, why the White House initially claimed that “situation room” photos showed Obama watching the raid live when in fact there was a blackout on the live feed, and why neighbors in the immediate area surrounding the compound said with absolute certainty that they had never seen Bin Laden and that they knew of no evidence whatsoever to suggest he lived there.
During the rest of the Guardian interview, which is well worth reading in its entirety, Hersh lambastes the corporate press and particularly the New York Times, which he says spends “so much more time carrying water for Obama than I ever thought they would.”
Hersh’s solution is to shut down news networks like NBC and ABC and fire 90% of mainstream editors, replacing them with real journalists who are outsiders and not afraid to speak truth to power.
Cloture Compilation: 79 Senators To Vote Out of Office in 2014
Friday, September 27th, marked yet another point in history that the Republicans voted against their constituents. Below, is the list of the 79 senators that voted against you, and kept Obama’s dream — We the People must vote these so-called representatives out of office in 2014. Please find your state and if he/she is red, remember the name.
| A Vote for Cloture is a Vote for Obamacare — 79 Senators to vote out of office in 2014 |
||
| Alexander (R-TN) Ayotte (R-NH) Baldwin (D-WI) Barrasso (R-WY) Baucus (D-MT) Begich (D-AK) Bennet (D-CO) Blumenthal (D-CT) Blunt (R-MO) Boozman (R-AR) Boxer (D-CA) Brown (D-OH) Burr (R-NC) Cantwell (D-WA) Cardin (D-MD) Carper (D-DE) Casey (D-PA) Chambliss (R-GA) Chiesa (R-NJ) Coats (R-IN) Coburn (R-OK) Cochran (R-MS) Collins (R-ME) Coons (D-DE) Corker (R-TN) Cornyn (R-TX) Donnelly (D-IN) |
Durbin (D-IL) Feinstein (D-CA) Franken (D-MN) Gillibrand (D-NY) Graham (R-SC) Hagan (D-NC) Harkin (D-IA) Heinrich (D-NM) Heitkamp (D-ND) Hirono (D-HI) Hoeven (R-ND) Isakson (R-GA) Johanns (R-NE) Johnson (D-SD) Johnson (R-WI) Kaine (D-VA) King (I-ME) Kirk (R-IL) Klobuchar (D-MN) Landrieu (D-LA) Leahy (D-VT) Levin (D-MI) Manchin (D-WV) Markey (D-MA) McCain (R-AZ) McCaskill (D-MO) McConnell (R-KY) |
Menendez (D-NJ) Merkley (D-OR) Mikulski (D-MD) Murkowski (R-AK) Murphy (D-CT) Murray (D-WA) Nelson (D-FL) Pryor (D-AR) Reed (D-RI) Reid (D-NV) Rockefeller (D-WV) Sanders (I-VT) Schatz (D-HI) Schumer (D-NY) Shaheen (D-NH) Stabenow (D-MI) Tester (D-MT) Thune (R-SD) Udall (D-CO) Udall (D-NM) Warner (D-VA) Warren (D-MA) Whitehouse (D-RI) Wicker (R-MS) Wyden (D-OR) |
Below, are the Patriots, the heroes that voted for We the People:
| Crapo (R-ID) Cruz (R-TX) Enzi (R-WY) Fischer (R-NE) Grassley (R-IA) Heller (R-NV) Inhofe (R-OK) |
Lee (R-UT) Moran (R-KS) Paul (R-KY) Portman (R-OH) Risch (R-ID) Roberts (R-KS) Rubio (R-FL) |
Scott (R-SC) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Toomey (R-PA) Vitter (R-LA) |
Pot Calling the Kettle Black: Obama Talks With Iranian President, Declares GOP ‘Extremists’
Other than the pot calling the kettle black, Obama once again is showing is favoritism toward Islam — I guess that’s we call him Islamist-in-Chief. Obama is willing to establish a relationship with a country that wants us dead and, is holding and torturing a Christian Priest. Just another day in the life of Barack Hussein Obama.
TheBlaze reported: Barack Obama addresses the press in the Brady Briefing Room at the White House September 27, 2013 in Washington, DC. Obama spoke about recent developments with Iran, and also addressed the possible government shutdown currently being debated on Capitol Hill. (Getty Images)
Speaking from the White House Friday, Obama revealed that he spoke with Iranian President Hassan Rouhani, the first such communication since 1979, to tackle the Islamic country’s nuclear program.
The new Iranian leader has said he does not want a nuclear weapons program, while Obama has stated that he does not object to a peaceful nuclear energy program in Iran. However, Obama stressed that Iran must provide “meaningful, transparent and verifiable actions” to demonstrate it does not have nuclear weapons ambitions.
If the two countries can reach an agreement, Obama said, it would be a “major step forward for the U.S. and the Islamic Republic of Iran.”
Obama said he expressed his “deep respect for the Iranian people” in the conversation and that the U.S. would work closely with allies in the region, including Israel, in going forward with the talks. Israel has expressed a deep distrust towards Iran’s nuclear ambitions.
Obama Family: Al-Shabaab And Obama Family Want Islamic Kenya to be Under Sharia Code
Walid Shoebat reported: Both the al-Shabaab terrorists, and the Obama family, want the nation of Kenya to be under Sharia code.
Al-Arab wrote that Obama’s cousin, Musa Obama, “studied Sharia in Medina”, called “upon the Arab and Islamic states to put more effort toward aiding the Kenyan Muslim brethren, especially since there is much support coming from Western nations and Western churches,” said that his organization, the Mama Sarah Obama Foundation, “gives scholarships to study Sharia in Medina [Saudi Arabia].”
He also stated “that despite the fact that Barack Obama hasn’t visited his tribe in Kenya since his election in the United States, there is a continual communication between him and several members of his family and his tribe in Kenya, of which the Kenyan prime minister is also a member.”
So, we know for a fact that Musa Obama studied Sharia in Medina, that his organization gives scholarships for Muslim youths to study Sharia in Saudi Arabia, for the purpose of dechristinizing and extinguishing Christianity in Kenya where the majority of people are Christians. Musa Obama, Sarah Obama (Obama’s grandmother) and Sayed Obama (Obama’s uncle) are lending scholarships for youths to enter the three major Sharia schools in Saudi Arabia, Umm al-Qura, the Islamic University in Medina, and the University of Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh.
Now, we have al-Shabaab terrorists executing a slaughter of people in a Nairobi mall, and when we look into what this group is, what we find is that they are a result of youths being sent to these very same universities in Saudi Arabia, including the one where Musa Obama studied.
In the sixties and seventies, the major conduit of wahabism into Somalia, was the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood bringing in Islamic schools into Somalia. Somalian youths were then given scholarships for three major Islamic universities, Umm al-qura University, the University of Medina, and Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University, all three of these institutions are the same schools to where the Mama Obama Sara Fund is sending Kenyan youths to learn Sharia.
The Gulf Issues Centre For Strategic Studies describes these institutions as “the spring of Wahhabism”, and further writes:
[Wahhabists] grew up in the Wahhabi and Salafi schools which imbibed radical ideas in the Islamic University in Medina, Umm Al-Qura University in Makkah, and the University of Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh.
A 2010 African Policy Briefing for the International Crisis Group, in writing on the history of wahhabism and the al-Shabab group in Somalia, places its significant growth with Somalian youths being recruited into Umm al-Qura University and the University of Medina, the same schools to which the Mama Sarah Obama Fund brings Kenyan youths to study Islamic Sharia:
Saudi Arabia – flush with petro-dollars after the oil shocks of the 1970s – was particularly instrumental in promoting Wahhabism. and Islamic charities sprang up in all the major urban centres and even in the remote countryside. Well-funded madrasas (religious schools) Thousands of Somali youngsters were brought to Saudi universities – principally Medina and Umm al-Qura – to study Wahhabi jurisprudence (fiqh) and missionary work (da’wa).
The two named universities are the ones which the Obamas are heavily associated with. Moreover, Obama’s brother, Malik Obama, is the executive secretary for the Islamic Da’wa Organization of Sudan, which is working to make Africa Islamic, the same goal of the two named universities’ da’wa programs.
The Foreign Policy Council attributed the rise of Islamic fundamentalism in Somalia substantially to these same three universities:
After Somalia’s independence in 1960, Egyptians opened secondary schools in many of the country’s towns. In the 1960s and 1970s, Saudi religious and educational institutions—especially the Islamic University of Medina, the Umm al-Qura University in Mecca, and the Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University in Riyadh—joined al-Azhar in offering scholarships to the graduates of these institutions. This development has parallels with the entrenchment of radical Islam in nearby Sudan via the establishment of the Sudanese Muslim Brotherhood, the precursor to the currently-ruling National Congress Party (formerly the National Islamic Front).
It was from this very Islamism that al-Shabaab arose, and, furthermore, the report parallels this rise to the founding of the National Congress Party in North Sudan, which is ran by Omar al-Bashir, the same Muslim Brotherhood member who Barack Obama’s brother, Malik Obama, is working with to make Africa fully Islamic and free of all Christianity.
This goal to replace Christianity with Islam in Kenya by the Obamas, was expressed by al-Arab in their interview with Musa Obama in the World University Ruff in Nairobi:
Muslims [in Kenya] suffer from the monumental Christianization aided by Zionist expansionism that infiltrates the nation.
Malik Obama and Omar al-Bashir were in a meeting together for the Islamic Da’wa Organization, in which Bashir said:
that the enemies of Islam who attempt to impose hegemony and make a siege and to encourage plots (and evil measures) towards Sudan will fail, stressing that Sudan rejects such methods of domination, despite the blockade that has been practiced upon it by the plotters of evil that bypassed Sudan with the help of Allah and the [Sudanese] determination.
Al-Shabaab, as well, wants to purge Kenya of all Christianity. When they were slaughtering people in the Nairobi mall, they lined civilians up, and executed them after deeming them non-Muslims because they could not “name the Prophet Mohammed’s mother or recite passages from the Koran”. There was one man who was Muslim who was spared after he recited some verses of the Koran.
Lets not forget that Kenya is 83% Christian, so we know that this massacre was done specifically to kill Christians. In 2011 it was reported that al-Shabaab decapitated a Christian in Somalia named Juma Nuradin Kamil.
But no matter, the world cares more for sodomites in Russia than Christians being massacred.
There is a very significant figure in the Nairobi mall shooting, Hassan Mahad Omar, also known as Hassaan Hussein Adam “Abu Salman.” Hassan is the unofficial mufti and ideologue for al-Shabaab, and their terrorist attacks are linked, directly and indirectly, to his fatwas.
Hassan teaches Islamic doctrine and has a degree from an Islamic university in Saudi Arabia, which means that he is interlinked with the three major Islamic universities to where the Obamas are sending Islamic youths to study Islam and Sharia.
Al-Shabaab, the group who slaughtered the people in the Christian majority nation of Kenya, and the Obamas, are associated with the universities which gave rise to the ideology of al-Shabaab, and both are striving for the same goal: an Islamic Kenya where Christianity would be outlawed.
Is it any wonder, now, that Obama prevented the revolution against the Muslim Brotherhood dictator of North Sudan, Omar al-Bashir, and that he is giving weapons to the jihadists in Syria?
Economist: Obamacare Discourages ‘Strong and Stable Families’
Breitbart reported: While President Obama has asserted his new healthcare reform law would finally cover low-income Americans without health insurance, an economist argues the law will still leave millions without coverage and discourage “strong and stable families.”
Former Department of Labor economist and current Manhattan Institute fellow Diana Furchtgott Roth wrote in a Washington Examiner op-ed that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) projects that the number of uninsured will remain at about 30 million from 2016 and beyond, down from 55 million people today.
Roth stated that a primary reason for such a large number left uninsured is that millions of low-income Americans will not be able to get subsidies to purchase health insurance through the state exchanges.
“If they are married to someone who has affordable single-family coverage from an employer—coverage that the worker is obligated to accept—they will not be eligible for premium subsidies on the exchanges,” Roth wrote on Wednesday.
Without subsidies to purchase health insurance, family insurance plans will cost approximately $20,000 annually, in after-tax dollars, by 2016.
Anyone who is under 400% of the poverty line—which is currently $94,000 for a family of four—qualifies for a subsidy, unless a family member has employer-provided insurance.
Roth stated that while this “family glitch” continues to be problematic and remains unaddressed by Congress, it is actually not an “error” but a purposeful effort to keep costs down:
Early drafts of the Affordable Care Act in the summer of 2009 required employers to offer affordable care to employees and their families, and prevented families from migrating to the exchanges.
When employers protested that this mandate would be too expensive, the requirement was changed to employees-only. But the provision preventing families from going to the exchanges stayed.
Allowing the rest of the family to get subsidized coverage on the exchange would have raised the cost of the law above the $1 trillion threshold, possibly dooming the bill to failure.
“The intentional exclusion of family members from coverage under subsidized insurance through the exchanges meant that the Act was scored as reducing the deficit, rather than increasing it,” American Enterprise Institute economist Joseph Antos told Roth. “That was the key to passage among fiscally-conservative Democrats.”
Roth noted that, in a perverse sense, low-income families would only be able to get subsidized insurance if the parents divorced. Consequently, some individuals may postpone marriage, yet another way in which the federal government is discouraging “strong and stable families.”
“Married workers may rationally prefer to work for firms that do not offer health insurance,” Roth wrote. “In that way, they can qualify to purchase family coverage through the exchange, and get a subsidy.”
However, if the employer of a married worker with a family does offer health insurance coverage, he or she may opt instead to work for a firm that provides unaffordable coverage, in which case the employee would be able to decline it and purchase subsidized insurance for him and his family on the exchange. This option, of course, is dependent upon the ability to be hired by that firm.
The uninsured will continue to receive care at emergency rooms and community health centers, Roth observed, though this was the original problem that ObamaCare was supposed to solve.
According to Roth, the solution is to end the employer requirement to provide health insurance and allow everyone a refundable tax credit to purchase health insurance.
“Then, just as people choose their auto and home insurance policies, let them choose their health insurance plans,” Roth advised.
Conservative Angle Archives 
You must be logged in to post a comment.