The Obama and Soros Coup: The Usurping of American Sovereignty and Insurgence of The New World Order

by Dan DeRoeck

Irrefutable evidence of a surreptitious and hideous ‘vision’ emerged early on in Barack Obama’s first term that went largely unnoticed by the American people, unchecked by our elected Republican ‘gatekeepers,’ and ignored by mainstream media.

The ‘cloak-and-dagger’ was then predictably revealed following the reelection of Obama in 2012,’ as numerous scandals began to peel away from his beguiled, rotten core.  Worse yet, the pervasive mainstream media willingly consenting to the lawlessness that ensued, help set up the precursor of massive, chaotic change, a notable Saul Alinsky trademark.

The new ‘vision’ had been packaged under the guise of democracy, contrived upon Obama’s ‘Fundamental Change‘ edict, and delivered to an unwitting accomplice, the low-information voter, the new posit majority of the country.

Even though the erosion of our Constitution began long before the Obama regime, the Marxist-in-Chief was handpicked to carry it out to an unprecedented level, a level of destruction so massive ‘walking it back’ to any semblance of normalcy would prove futile.

Obama is responsible for tipping the scale in his favor, piling on over 5 trillion of debt that will ultimately collapse world financial markets and eventually render the U.S. dollar worthless.

The national health reform bill, a.k.a. ObamaCare, was the opening act of this play.  The numerous scandals that followed were spectacles, mere sideshows designed for the public to ‘take the eye of the ball.’  In the meantime, Obama will no doubt heroically campaign against those very same scandals he ordered up to create a facade that he is in no way, shape or form, part of, and will continue to ‘fight to find the answers’ for the people, the charade that became known as the Limbaugh Theorem.

There’s no other way to put it — America, the land of the free and home of the brave, has been hoodwinked.

You might ask, who is behind such a ubiquitous vision of doom? Who could prop up a former ‘pot head’ allowing him to command the world stage with relative ease?  Does George Soros come to mind?  In fact Soros has nearly unlimited funding and with ‘a little help from his friends’ at the Trilateral Commission, there seems no limit to what they can achieve.

George Soros is a billionaire “philanthropist” who hates America. He is a soulless, anti-God, anti-family, pro-Marxist, and self-proclaimed sociopath, that has no self-conscience. Soros has played a key role in quite a few political revolutions around the world, including the 1992 ‘Black Wednesday’ where he allegedly brought down the Bank of England, and collected a cool one billion dollars for his effort.  Feeding his psychotic narcissism is seemingly Soros’ only objective in life; he takes great joy in collapsing national economies and inflicting pain onto others in exchange for rabid power.

The usurping of American sovereignty is in full swing; we may soon be at the mercy of a Marxist regime, specifically designed to decimate the democratic benchmark of the world, the United States.  Make no mistake, the ignorance and contempt of the voting masses will ultimately carry the ball over the goal line for a group of elitists cloaked in altruism and blood on their hands.

Soros’ long-time political aspiration is to establish a New World Order government, but by no means is he acting alone.  The Council on Foreign Relations, the Trilateral Commission or the Bilderberg Group, is the brain of the scare crow, one in which controls Obama’s every major move.  This vast network of private think tanks, foundations, unions, stealth PACs, and other front groups make up the ‘Shadow Party,’ the mastermind.  Obama is merely the hand-picked, surrogate puppet that carries out the marching orders.

The Trilateral Commission strategically appointed key members of the media including, David Bradley, Chairman of Atlantic Media Company, Karen Elliot House, former Senior V.P., Dow Jones & Company and Wall Street Journal, Richard Plepler, Co-president at HBO, and the list goes on and on.  Soros and company, have created the perfect coup and designed it around the ‘Manchurian President’ of choice, Barack Hussein Obama.

Obama’s nexus to the Trilateral Commission is unequivocal.  Immediately after taking office, he appointed twelve per­cent of the U.S. Tri­lat­eral Com­mis­sion mem­ber­ship to key positions, three of those positions related to our national security.

Soros and the Trilateral Commission have never lost sight of the grand prize, that of collapsing the U.S. economy and destroying the dollar.  And, Soros makes no bones about it when telling Financial Times in October 2009 that ‘an orderly decline of the dollar is actually desirable.’

‘The entire edifice of global financial markets has been erected on the false premise that markets can be left to their own devices, we must find a new paradigm and rebuild from the ground up. I decided to sponsor INET to facilitate the process.’ – George Soros

Needless to say, if the dollar gets toppled as the world’s preferred currency, it would be catastrophic for the United States.  Sadly, this may come to fruition with or without the assistance of George Soros.

One could make the argument that Soros is simply an ‘opportunist’ taking advantage of inadequate, flailing economies of the world.  Others see it as a deeper evil; a subset of carefully crafted, culturally changing events predicated upon major economic parameters, all to accomplish the end goal, the feeding of unquenchable power and greed to an elite class.  To George Soros, the U.S. is simply a pawn on his chess board, one in which he desperately wants and will go to any lengths to make it happen.

The United States is in a perilous state. Her back is against the wall.  We are literally clinging onto constitutional sovereignty while witnessing the destruction of our economy, and possibly culture and society as we know it.  There is no time for excuses, and there’s no time for political correctness.  We must stand tall and fight for our Constitution with every last breath within us.  We must now contend with a formidable enemy that is among us.

Rand Paul: It’s Sad and Cheap of Christie to say to 9/11 victims, ‘Oh, I’m the Only One Who Cares About These Victims’

It’s really, I think, kind of sad and cheap that he would use the cloak of 9/11 victims and say, ‘Oh, I’m the only one who cares about these victims,’

Obama Administration: White House Creates Team To Shape Americans’ Behavior

The next wave of ‘Obamanism’ is transpiring, this time the government’s attempt to transform our society, to ‘nudge’ our behavior to suit their agenda, called the ‘Behavioral Insights Team.’  How quaint…

Video of Cass Sunstein above, President Barack Obama’s former Regulatory Czar promoting the Nudge theory.

Fox News reports: The federal government is hiring what it calls a “Behavioral Insights Team” that will look for ways to subtly influence people’s behavior, according to a document describing the program obtained by FoxNews.com. Critics warn there could be unintended consequences to such policies, while supporters say the team could make government and society more efficient.

While the program is still in its early stages, the document shows the White House is already working on such projects with almost a dozen federal departments and agencies including the Department of Health and Human Services and the Department of Agriculture.

“Behavioral sciences can be used to help design public policies that work better, cost less, and help people to achieve their goals,” reads the government document describing the program, which goes on to call for applicants to apply for positions on the team.

The document was emailed by Maya Shankar, a White House senior adviser on social and behavioral sciences, to a university professor with the request that it be distributed to people interested in joining the team. The idea is that the team would “experiment” with various techniques, with the goal of tweaking behavior so people do everything from saving more for retirement to saving more in energy costs.

The document praises subtle policies to change behavior that have already been implemented in England, which already has a “Behavioral Insights Team.” One British policy concerns how to get late tax filers to pay up.

“Sending letters to late taxpayers that indicated a social norm — i.e., that ‘9 out of 10 people in Britain paid their taxes on time’ — resulted in a 15 percent increase in response rates over a three-month period, rolling out to £30 million of extra annual revenue,” the document reads.

Another policy aimed to convince people to install attic insulation to conserve energy.

“Offering an attic-clearance service (at full cost) to people led to a five-fold increase in their subsequent adoption of attic-insulation.”

Such policies — which encourage behavior subtly rather than outright require it — have come to be known as “nudges,” after an influential 2008 book titled “Nudge” by former Obama regulatory czar Cass Sunstein and Chicago Booth School of Business professor Richard Thaler popularized the term.

The term “nudge” has already been associated with the new program, as one professor who received Shankar’s email forwarded it to others with the note: “Anyone interested in working for the White House in a ‘nudge’ squad? The UK has one and it’s been extraordinarily successful.”

Richard Thaler told FoxNews.com that the new program sounds good.

“I don’t know who those people are who would not want such a program, but they must either be misinformed or misguided,” he said.

“The goal is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of government by using scientifically collected evidence to inform policy designs. What is the alternative? The only alternatives I know are hunches, tradition, and ideology (either left or right.)”

But some economists urge caution.

“I am very skeptical of a team promoting nudge policies,” Michael Thomas, an economist at Utah State University, told FoxNews.com.

“Ultimately, nudging … assumes a small group of people in government know better about choices than the individuals making them.”

And sometimes, he added, government actually promotes the wrong thing.

“Trans-fats were considered better than saturated and unsaturated fats in the past. Now we know this is an error.”

Every intervention would need to be tested to make sure it works well, said Harvard economics professor David Laibson, who studies behavioral economics and is in touch with the people in government setting up the program. He added that the exact way the team will function is currently unknown.

“We have to see the details to be sure, but this could work out very well,” he said.

Asked about details, Dan Cruz, spokesman for the U.S. General Services Administration (the department which the team will be a part of) told FoxNews.com: “As part of the Administration’s ongoing efforts to promote efficiency and savings, GSA is considering adding some expertise from academia in the area of program efficiency and evaluation under its Performance Improvement Council.”

Maya Shankar did not respond to questions.

Laibson added that he hoped the U.S. program would stay away from overly controversial subjects.

“Let’s say we want people to engage in some healthy behavior like a weight loss program, and then start automatically enrolling overweight people in weight loss programs — even though they could opt out, I’m guessing that would be viewed as offensive … a lot of people would say, ‘I didn’t ask for this, this is judging who I am and who I should be.”

But Laibson added that there are very real benefits to some “nudge” policies — such as one that increases the number of people registered as organ donors by making people decide when they apply for a drivers’ license.

Thaler, who is also an adviser to the British Behavioral Insights Team, said that his research also supports automatically enrolling people in retirement savings plans.

“Many people have struggled to save enough to provide for an adequate retirement. … Two simple design changes can dramatically improve the situation … automatic enrollment (default people into the plan with the option to easily opt out) and automatic escalation, where workers can sign up to have their contributions increased annually,” he said.

Jerry Ellig, an economist at the Mercatus Center, said that some “nudges” are reasonable, but warned about a slippery slope.

“If you can keep it to a ‘nudge’ maybe it can be beneficial,” he added, “but nudges can turn into shoves pretty quickly.”